Tutorial: Removing Fields
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
— Antoine de Saint-Exupery
When working on Nuudle, you will most likely find that some features and fields that are no longer necessary. In scenarios like this, you can consider refactoring the existing Person
model to suit your use case.
In this tutorial, we’ll do exactly just that and remove the address
field from Person
.
Safely deleting Address
Fortunately, IntelliJ IDEA provides a robust refactoring tool that can identify most usages. Let’s try to use it as much as we can.
Assisted refactoring
The address
field in Person
is actually an instance of the seedu.address.model.person.Address
class. Since removing the Address
class will break the application, we start by identifying Address
’s usages. This allows us to see code that depends on Address
to function properly and edit them on a case-by-case basis. Right-click the Address
class and select Refactor
> Safe Delete
through the menu.
Choose to View Usages
and you should be presented with a list of Safe Delete Conflicts
. These conflicts describe locations in which the Address
class is used.
Remove usages of Address
by performing Safe Delete
s on each entry. You will need to exercise discretion when removing usages of Address
. Functions like ParserUtil#parseAddress()
can be safely removed but its usages must be removed as well. Other usages like in EditPersonDescriptor
may require more careful inspection.
Let’s try removing references to Address
in EditPersonDescriptor
.
-
Safe delete the field
address
inEditPersonDescriptor
. -
Select
Yes
when prompted to remove getters and setters. -
Select
View Usages
again.
-
Remove the usages of
address
and selectDo refactor
when you are done.Tip: Removing usages may result in errors. Exercise discretion and fix them. For example, removing theaddress
field from thePerson
class will require you to modify its constructor. -
Repeat the steps for the remaining usages of
Address
After you are done, verify that the application still works by compiling and running it again.
Manual refactoring
Unfortunately, there are usages of Address
that IntelliJ IDEA cannot identify. You can find them by searching for instances of the word address
in your code (Edit
> Find
> Find in path
).
Places of interest to look out for would be resources used by the application. main/resources
contains images and fxml
files used by the application and test/resources
contains test data. For example, there is a $address
in each PersonCard
that has not been removed nor identified.
A quick look at the PersonCard
class and its fxml
file quickly reveals why it slipped past the automated refactoring.
PersonCard.java
...
@FXML
private Label address;
...
PersonCard.fxml
...
<Label fx:id="phone" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$phone" />
<Label fx:id="address" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$address" />
<Label fx:id="email" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$email" />
...
After removing the Label
, we can proceed to formally test our code. If everything went well, you should have most of your tests pass. Fix any remaining errors until the tests all pass.
Tidying up
At this point, your application is working as intended and all your tests are passing. What’s left to do is to clean up references to Address
in test data and documentation.
In src/test/data/
, data meant for testing purposes are stored. While keeping the address
field in the json files does not cause the tests to fail, it is not good practice to let cruft from old features accumulate.
invalidPersonPatientBook.json
:
{
"persons": [ {
"name": "Person with invalid name field: Ha!ns Mu@ster",
"phone": "9482424",
"email": "hans@example.com",
"address": "4th street"
} ]
}
You can go through each individual json
file and manually remove the address
field.